Shock Testing Paves the Way for Floating Tunnels

By Gemini News 07-16-2017 05:39:15

[By Albert H. Collett]

Concrete can tolerate much more force that previously believed, which could open the door to a new kind of road structure: a floating tunnel.

The E39 is a nearly 1100-km long coastal road that crosses seven major fjords by use of ferries. Norwegian authorities are working to improve the road by eliminating ferry crossings, which in addition to being costly, mean that drivers have to wait for ferries if they don’t arrive at the crossing at exactly the right time.

The biggest hurdle to this improved coastal road is found at Sognefjord, Norway’s longest and deepest fjord. At its mouth, the fjord is 2.3 miles wide and 4300 feet deep. Building a conventional suspension bridge would require a structure that would be double the length of the existing record holder and would be three times the length of the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco. To hold the suspension bridge, the two towers at either end would have to be 1500 feet high, or 500 feet taller than the Eiffel Tower.

But a series of experiments from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology’s (NTNU) Centre for Advanced Structural Analysis, or CASA, could pave the way for an entirely new type of water crossing: submerged floating tunnels. Experiments in a shock tube at CASA’s research laboratories show that concrete can tolerate much more pressure than previously thought.

“We conducted the first experiments using five-centimetre-thick, unreinforced concrete plates. They were exposed to a seven bar pressure wave. We chose this pressure because we found it in the standard specification texts published by the Norwegian Public Roads Administration. To our surprise, very little happened,” says postdoctoral fellow Martin Kristoffersen, in NTNU’s Department of Structural Engineering.

He is one of the numerous researchers who is investigating the options for creating the ferry-free route along Norway’s coastal highway E39, from Kristiansand to Trondheim. Kristoffersen thinks the probability of soon seeing the world’s first submerged floating tunnel, also known as a tube bridge, is growing.

Very good margin

The NTNU researcher has one year left of his three-year project. The mission is to find out what happens when a tunnel bridge is exposed to an internal explosion.

The findings to date will soon be presented in a peer-reviewed professional journal. They are based on a large number of experiments using varying pressure waves in the shock tube.

The preliminary conclusion is that a tube bridge will be able to withstand most likely explosion scenarios by a good margin, including tanker accidents like the recent one in the Oslo fjord tunnel.

The big difference between the two-inch-thick plate in the first experiment and the final dimensions is worth noting.

The tunnel being considered will have walls that are between 30 and 40 inches thick – in other words, 15 to 20 times as thick as in the first experiment – and reinforced. Even the car bomb that Anders Behring Breivik set off in the government quarter would have problems. That bomb had an explosive force equivalent to 700 kilos of TNT.

“It’s been a win-win situation. For one thing, we’ve been able to test the tube on a new material. Also, the tube is unique when it comes to applying repeatable loads under controlled conditions. It’s proven extremely useful for gaining a better understanding of how the concrete handles the stresses,” says Martin Kristoffersen.

The tube can tolerate quite a bit. The pressure chamber at one end can build the pressure up to 2,500 PSI (170 bars). This corresponds to the pressure at a sea depth of one mile. In practice, most experiments take place at much lower pressure.

Kristoffersen actually holds the record so far, with 1100 PSI. The level was still 430 PSI when the pressure wave reached the test plate at the other end of the 60-foot-long pipe. That was more than the concrete plate could withstand.

This article appears courtesy of Gemini News and may be found in its original form here

The opinions expressed herein are the author's and not necessarily those of The Maritime Executive.